As it occurs with the important events in my life, the first thing I remember is that it took me some time to assimilate the fact that I had to go to Europe to present a paper. Perhaps I only completely realized the consequences of that when I landed in Paris. It really felt like if up to that moment I had lived inside a capsule: seeing such a completely different world, very different people speaking all kinds of languages, felt like a strong yet gentle slap in my (innocent and skeptical) Colombian face. Indeed, only then I realized that a different reality ---a better one, from many points of view--- was truly possible for me. Only realizing that was illuminating.
Just as in the first trip, this time I stayed in a town outside Paris, in the south (Orsay). Since the airport (CDG) is located out in the north of Paris, you should take a train (called RER) that completely crosses Paris and connects it to neighboring towns. I remember my first RER trip by having a strange mix of surprise, jet-lag and eagerness to absorb as many things as possible. It was almost a childish feeling. This time, while in the RER, I tried to recall that feeling: I discovered that my eagerness prevented me from seeing things calmly. Put another way, I realized that being in Europe (well, Italy) for a while was useful to look beyond the childish novelty and surprise, and start appreciating some fine details. This also has to do with the different standpoints a tourist and a non-tourist have about the same place: where the former only sees possibilities for discovering attractive spots, the latter only sees an unsurprising (yet only partially understood) reality.
One of my motivations for my first trip to Paris was to find out whether doing a PhD in France, in some topic I was interested at that time, was possible. Back in 2005 I had some doubts and great expectation on the idea of doing a PhD. It's amazing to see how things have changed! While in 2005 doing a PhD in Italy was not in my plans at all, it is now my reality. Now I have great doubts and some expectations on the idea of finishing the PhD. It is curious (frightening could be a more suitable word) how the level of uncertainty regarding things has only increased: I have gone from a naive "will I find a nice place abroad to do a PhD?" to a more realistic "how will life be after the PhD? will i find a job?" While in 2005 I discovered that my wishes about to do a PhD in France were a bit difficult to do, now I don't discard France as a possible place to go after the PhD.
(Do not get me wrong: feel lost or frustrated is the normal status for a PhD student. After all, it's well known that with every PhD degree an extra degree on frustration management is awarded.)
To conclude, some words on my perception of French people. It hasn't changed too much in three years, although I admit it is less radical now. (In general, my opinions are more moderate now than, say, 5 years ago.) Few interactions with French people are enough to realize they're more distant than Colombians. In my first trip I learned that it's not they are mean by default (of course, there are some of them that are really mean) but it's also that we Colombians are too nice to each other. Even with people who they haven't seen in their lives. (People who know me know that I am not the warmest person in the world, but even I am warmer than an average European.) It is my impression that people in France (and apparently everywhere in the world but South America) is really individualist, and of course this has pros and cons. On the one hand, in our countries is perhaps easier to fit in: you get new friends very easily, for instance. On the other hand, the extremely individualist character people have in European countries endows societies a distant, cold atmosphere: you feel you have to hang around for a long while before fitting in. We should not forget that we're talking about societies that differ on a lot of aspects, especially in age. Societies in south american countries behave like young, immature teenagers, who have yet a lot to learn and go through. European societies are like those adults that are so self-confident that disregard younger friends, especially if they come from distant, unknown places. Young south american societies make stupid mistakes that the uptight European societies do not always manage to understand.
Apart from individualism, another thing I recognize in French people is how direct they can be. This is also a great contrast with the standard latin personality. In Colombia a critique is usually taken personally, and there's no way a big discussion doesn't end up in a real fight. In fact, before my first trip I thought I was a rather direct person. Being surrounded by people who are as or more direct than you is certainly an enriching experience. To illustrate this point (and to conclude the post), I take a story that occurred to my Colombian advisor in France. He and his wife went to some place to eat some fine cheese. They chose a cheese that had a smell that was so strong, that my advisor's wife had to complain to the waiter. He replied:
"madame, if you want to eat something with a nice smell, you should eat a soap."